Voter Fraud EXPOSED – 18 Million Invalid Registrations and Millions of DEAD Voters…
news

For decades we’ve heard the progressive left dehumanize, insult and intimidate those concerned citizens who support the implementation of a national voter ID registration program, suggesting that any such policy is discrimination towards African-Americans, and that actual voter fraud is a figment of imagination, or perhaps worst yet a premeditated bias by critical thinking individuals towards minorities, and although their was enough anecdotal evidence to suggest that voter fraud was a serious issue, actual data was always difficult to come by, until now.

The “Conspiracy Theory” that Obama joked about is in fact real and it may perhaps decide the outcome of this upcoming presidential election.

The stunning report was highlighted on the critically acclaimed Lou Dobbs Show, the popular Fox host citied a Pew Report stating that 1 in 8 votes cast are “significantly inaccurate” and are “no longer valid,” which actually comes out to 18-million votes being invalid and out of that number over 2-million votes are being currently cast by “dead people.”Judicial Watch President Tom Fitten responded to the new Pew Report stating; “The best solution would be to reform the system in the long run more voter ID citizenship verification. In the short run, the American people should pressure law enforcement to prosecute voting fraud. This can be done at the local, state, and federal level.

However Charlie Hurt a Washington Times staff writer points out that voter fraud is a lot worst then one illegal vote, in that for every one fraudulent vote cast, it cancels out one legitimate vote, therefore it’s doubly egregious.

Trump has been complaining all along that the system is rigged, and this is the proof!

SUSAN SARANDON: CLINTON ‘IS THE DANGER’, NOT TRUMP
susan-sarandon-clinton


We have a new celebrity on the Trump train and she has some valid points why!

The person in question is actress Susan Sarandon, who stated that Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy strategies, makes her an enormous national security risk, quite bigger than Donald Trump.

“I believe in a way she’s more dangerous, except they’re both talking to Henry Kissinger apparently lately,” Sarandon stated this Thursday.

Sarandon who vocally supported Bernie Sanders for president is interested in elaborating why, even though a Democrat, Hillary is the no brainer NO!

From TheHill:

“Her record — I mean, she did not learn a thing from Iraq. She is an interventionist. She’s done horrible things, horrible things, and very callously,” she added.

“I don’t know if she’s overcompensating or what her trip is. I think we’ll be in Iran in two seconds. That scares me. That frightens me.”

Sarandon, who supports Bernie Sanders for president, said Trump’s ideas are too implausible to be dangerous.

“This is what we’re fed — ‘he’s so dangerous, he’s so dangerous,’ ” she said. “Seriously, I’m not worried about a wall being built and Mexico paying for it.
Sponsored by Revcontent
20 Stars Who Are Aging Horribly - No. 6 Will Make You Cringe!
Aisha Buhari Appeals To Borno, Adamawa, and Yobe Governors To Help Malnourished
Eight Facts You Need To Know About New INEC Boss, Mahmood Yakubu - The InfoStrid

“He’s not going to get rid of every Muslim living in this country. Has he made it the norm to be racist and vent these kinds of things? Yes. But seriously, I don’t know what his policies are.”

On the other hand, Sarandon said, Clinton’s record on foreign policy is cause for alarm.

“I do know what her policies are. I do know where she’s taking money from. And I do know that she’s not transparent and I know that nobody calls her on it.”

Sarandon predicted in a separate interview that Clinton will ultimately face indictment for her use of a private email server while secretary of State.

“Nobody’s even talking about this indictment,” she told MSNBC. “What happens with that, besides the trust issue of catching her in so many lies?”

“Well, there has been no indictment,” Chris Jansing responded.

“No, but there’s going to be,” responded Sarandon. “I mean, it’s inevitable.”

US Blames Northern Lights on Russia, Imposes Sanctions, Threatens War
John Rachel Subscribe to John Rachel
(John Rachel blog) Subscribe to John Rachel blog
Fri, Oct 21, 2016 | 7,392 62
Donate!
3k
63
Originally appeared at John Rachel blog

The U.S. State Department has accused Russia of hacking into the ionosphere and generating excessive and annoying levels of Northern Lights. The ongoing display of light saber rattling, apparently a misguided attempt to “show off” the technological prowess of their teams of warmongering physicists, extends its “tentacles of terror” deep into the sovereign territory of the U.S. and its European allies. This has resulted in widespread panic in U.S. cities like Buffalo, NY and Detroit, MI, where public displays of drunkenness and rowdiness have skyrocketed.

While no evidence of Russian responsibility has been offered, White House spokesperson, Josh Earnest, recently stated: “The motive is obvious. The constant flashing and gyrating shapes in the sky are intended to cause sleep deprivation. When people don’t get enough sleep, their guard is down. The Russians are trying to undermine our national security with this cheap stunt. It’s an unprecedented act of aggression and, trust me, will not go unanswered. We are coordinating our response with the Department of Defense, NSA, CIA, and Hayden Planetarium in New York.”

One reporter asked about the rumors that world-renowned astrophysicist, Dr. Neal deGraas Tyson, had been summoned to the White House to seek his expert advice on exactly what appropriate counter-measures and retaliation might be available.

“Well . . . Mr. Tyson appears to be a Putin-apologist and commie sympathizer. When we approached him about this, after he stopped rudely laughing in our faces, the guy just shrugged his shoulders and walked away shaking his head. What an arrogant man. We are keeping our eye on him.”

U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, has just presented American demands to the United Nations Security Council that a comprehensive regime of economic sanctions be imposed on Russia for tampering with the electromagnetic field of the Earth.

“We need to show these Russians once and for all we mean business. Today it’s Northern Lights. Tomorrow they’ll be injecting vodka into the aquifers serving the citizens of the free world, or blasting balalaika music at us 24/7 from outer space. This is an outrage and an act of war. As humanitarians concerned with the welfare of people everywhere on this planet, it is our duty to support the Russian citizenry as they attempt to free themselves from the barbaric oppression and inhumane cruelty of government tyranny, by cutting off all food, water, medicine, electricity, and internet access. Let these sanctions do their job. Pass this resolution immediately!”

In a separate interview, another reporter asked Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, what will America do if the sanctions don’t work.

“We have a Plan B. If sanctions don’t break the chains of totalitarian control which Putin is attempting to impose on the world, perhaps a few thousand cruise missiles will.”

So . . .

Rest assured, folks, our enlightened leadership has the situation under control. America will in the end triumph.

But just to be safe . . .

While there is no medical evidence that Northern Lights per se can cause physiological damage, the FDA has just recommended that until this siege is brought under control, everyone should stay indoors and keep their blinds and curtains drawn.

Should you have to go out at night, apply SPF-50 sun block to exposed areas and wear sunglasses. DO NOT STARE AT THE LIGHTS! It is unlikely but still possible that they contain subliminal “brainwashing” messages. If you are bothered by the unusual urge to read Das Kapital by Karl Marx, or seized by the impulse to stand on a table and break out singing The Internationale, immediately see a doctor. This is covered under Obamacare.
Donate!
3k
63
Did you enjoy this article? - Consider helping us!
Russia Insider depends on your donations: the more you give, the more we can do.
$1
$5
$10
Other amount

If you wish you make a tax-deductible contribution of $1,000 or more, please visit our Support page for instructions

Click here for our commenting guidelines
On fire
Sweden Was a Military Giant - Until It Invaded Russia
Michael Peck (The National Interest) 5,487
Will He Halt? Erdogan Is Now Just 15 KM From Syrian Army in Aleppo (And Pounding the Kurds Who Stand in the Way)
Adam Hill 7,245
The Slide Toward War With Russia
(The Nation) 5,995
US Blames Northern Lights on Russia, Imposes Sanctions, Threatens War
John Rachel (John Rachel blog) 7,392
Has World War III Already Started?
Nick Giambruno (International Man) 12,288
The Elite Have No Idea Society Is Near The Breaking Point
Chindit13 (Zero Hedge) 11,023
Russia vs US: In a Shooting Nuclear War Is Missile Defense Even Useful?
Leonid Nersisyan (The National Interest) 6,380
Russian Kh-101 Air-to-Surface Cruise Missile: Unique and Formidable
Andrei Akulov (Strategic Culture Foundation) 5,751
BECOME A MEDIA SKEPTIC

All our headlines, in one daily email

CNN Hosts Panic As The Audience Shouts “Lock Her Up” On Live TV
cnn-video
Comments

One of the worst things the liberal media can do is start a live segment where they present their views in public. Not only is it because they’re bought and paid for by the Clinton campaign and her special interests, but for the fact that they look like absolute fools when the American public gets a hold of them.

Before and after the debate, CNN correspondents on a panel were talking about how Hillary Clinton will win the election, trying and failing to ignore the countless chants of “lock her up” behind them. The crowd was overwhelming and you could see the presenters starting to panic, flub their lines, and stutter. This is good.

It happened not once,

Western-Backed' Syrian Rebels Not Letting Aleppo Civilians Leave Conflict Zone

© AFP 2016/ GEORGE OURFALIAN Politics 17:37 22.10.2016(updated 19:28 22.10.2016) Get short URL 91799122 Terrorists in Aleppo are continuing to shell humanitarian corridors. Since a humanitarian pause came into effect on Thursday, the corridors have been under frequent shelling and sniper fire. The area of the humanitarian corridor in Aleppo, Syria © Sputnik/ Michael Alaeddin Aleppo’s 'Humanitarian Pause': Militants Launch Mortar Attack on Civilians Preparing to Leave On Saturday, it was reported that al-Nusra Front terrorist group and Ahrar al-Sham rebels what are considered to be "moderate" by the West are not letting the International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC) mission to evacuate the wounded from eastern Aleppo. The Russian Foreign Ministry has called on all the countries who could influence the militants in Aleppo to urge them to allow international humanitarian missions access to the city. Terrorist-controlled eastern Aleppo districts as seen from the city's Citadel. (File) © Sputnik/ Michael Alaeddin Al-Nusra Front, Syrian Rebels Not Letting Red Cross Evacuate Wounded From Aleppo All humanitarian corridors that should be used by civilians and militants to leave Aleppo are blocked by militants. The corridors are constantly under militants' fire, Lt. Gen. Sergei Rudskoy, the chief of the Russian General Staff's Main Operational Directorate, said. The humanitarian pause was aimed to ensure the safe evacuation of unarmed militants and civilians from eastern Aleppo through eight humanitarian corridors. The Russian General Staff said earlier that the pause was extended for one day, from 080 to 160 local time on Saturday. It is no surprise that the shelling of the humanitarian corridors continues because Western-backed rebels are not interested in ending the violence, said Catherine Shakdam, director of programs at the Shafaqna Institute of Middle Eastern Studies. "We’re stuck in the same vicious cycle, where you have Western powers accusing Russia, Iran, and of course Damascus of not allowing civilians to run away from the conflict zone. But then at the same time, when there is a ceasefire agreed upon, and a humanitarian corridor is set up, then this happens. And those moderates are backed by Western powers," she said in an interview with RT. She underscored that the West and Western media do not want to admit that Russia and Damascus are trying to help civilians in Aleppo. Instead, they accuse them of committing war crimes. As for Western powers, "it has been proven time and time again on the ground by this simple fact that they are backing and supporting those so-called moderates, who are in fact terror radicals – they are the ones enabling them; they are the ones committing war crimes – not the other way around," she added. Meanwhile, on Friday, the Russian General Staff said that terrorists used the humanitarian pause in Aleppo to reinforce and prepare new attacks onthe outskirts of the city. "A group of over 1,200 militants, including 30 suicide-bombers, is preparing an attack on Aleppo from south-west. They have tanks, armored vehicles and over 20 pickups with heavy machine guns," Rudskoy said.

Read more: https://sputniknews.com/politi....cs/20161022104661909

What Russia sending more air defense missiles to Syria means
Oren Dorell , USA TODAY 4:59 p.m. EDT October 5, 2016
AP RUSSIA SYRIA I FILE RUS

(Photo: Ivan Sekretarev, AP)

Russia on Wednesday turned to Twitter to justify its deployment of advanced S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria.

The tweet, posted by the official Twitter account of the Russian embassy in Washington, @RusEmbUSA, was attached to photos of White House spokesman Josh Earnest and an S-300 missile battery with the caption “…because you never really know what kind of assistance terrorists might get.”

“All jokes aside, #Russia will take every defensive measure necessary to protect its personnel stationed in #Syria from terrorist threat,” the tweet said.

The message reinforces previous warnings against United States' interference with a combined Russian and Syrian air campaign in Syria. The U.S. says Russian and Syrian aircraft have targeted primarily opposition forces and civilian areas in Syria, especially in the northern city of Aleppo, where several hospitals have been bombed and a United Nations aid convoy was hit on Oct. 19., killing 20 people.

The recent bombing campaign, which ended a Sept. 12 cease-fire brokered by the U.S. and Russia, is the worst in Aleppo’s history and marks an escalation by Russia and its ally. The State Department has said the Obama administration is considering various options, including a military response. Secretary of State John Kerry has warned Russia that one result of its actions could be that “more Russian aircraft will be shot down.”

The timing, however, weeks before a close presidential election, makes it unlikely the U.S. will embark on a military adventure in the waning months of President Obama’s last term. It may be a warning to the next president, whether it be Republican Donald Trump or Democrat Hillary Clinton. Trump's running mate, Gov. Mike Pence of Indiana and Clinton have expressed support for imposing a no-fly zone to protect civilians in Syria.

"The Russian move might be more a message to Hillary and Trump, to make the battle space in Syria to look too dangerous," said Michael O'Hanlon, a military analyst at the Brookings Institution, a think tank in Washington, D.C.

The missile system the Russians are touting is an excellent ambush weapon that adds a significant threat to U.S. air operations in Syria, unless American leaders are willing to accept a few losses, O'Hanlon said. Even if U.S. aircraft use radar jamming devices, the S-300, which works in a network connected by fiber-optic cables, can develop a picture of the battle space using the signal of U.S. aircraft trying to jam enemy radar.

"It can easily shoot down a U.S. fighter jet with virtually no warning," he said. "I’ve never heard an American military or intelligence official poo poo the S-300."

The S-300 deployment would also change the kind of no fly zone that a future president might impose, O'Hanlon said.

Rather than shooting down aircraft, as the U.S. did in Iraq during the 1990s, grounding aircraft in the presence of S-300 systems is more likely to focus on destroying runways, fuel depots and aircraft on the ground, while avoiding Russian personnel.

In the wrong hands, it could also threaten military and civilian air traffic in neighboring countries that are U.S. allies.

Here are five things we know about it:

Range and capability: Versions of the S-300 have a range of 250 miles, at Mach 7.5 (7.5 times the speed of sound)

Who has the missiles in the Middle East: Russia has talked for years of selling its premier air defense system to Iran and Syria. Deployments in Iran began last month.

Why they are controversial: The system’s range would extend into the territory of neighboring states, including Turkey, which shot down a Russian fighter jet last year, Iraq, where the U.S. is conducting air strikes against the Islamic State, Jordan, which also conducts air strikes in Iraq, and Israel, which has conducted several air strikes in Syria to prevent the transfer of “game changing” weapons to Hezbollah, the Lebanon-based Shiite militia backed by Iran.

How would Syria’s neighbors react? Israel sees S-300 as a “game changing” weapon and therefore a legitimate target, and has vowed to do what it must to preserve its freedom to operate over Syria and Lebanon. But Israel is unlikely to conduct a strike that would harm Russian operators or advisers.

Where have they been used before? While it’s not clear if an S-300 was involved, the missile can be fired from a BUK system, which includes sensors and launch vehicles. Such a system is suspected in the downing of the Malaysian Airlines Flight 17, which crashed in eastern Ukraine in 2014. A recent Dutch report said the system traveled from Russia before the shootdown, and later returned to Russia.

The incident, which resulted in 298 deaths, is a potent example of what could go wrong.

Israel gets F 35 fighter jets after Iran’s Russian S 300 missiles become operational

Hillary LOSES CNN…Host Slams Her On National TV! – WOW [WATCH]
122.3k
Shares
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Journalists love to brag about “speaking truth to power” but most of them are really more concerned about pushing a liberal agenda. One reporter, however, is doing his job and he’s taking on not just a powerful government agency but the left’s favored candidate for president.Breitbart has the story:

In a video collaboration between CNN’s “State of the Union” and FactCheck.org released on Friday, CNN anchor Jake Tapper stated that Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s claim during an interview on “Fox News Sunday” that FBI Director James Comey testified that her statements about her emails were true was a false claim, and “all you politicians out there, you are perfectly entitled to your own opinions, not to your own facts.”
Tapper said, “Is that true? Did FBI Director James Comey testify that the repeated comments Hillary Clinton had made to the public about her private email server ‘were truthful’? No, that is not true.”

Tapper set the record straight about which of Hillary Clinton’s emails were classified, which contradicts the Democrat’s campaign spin:

“Hillary Clinton had repeatedly told the public that none of the emails contained information that was classified in any way,” Tapper said, and then proved that was false.

It’s heartening to see that even the mainstream media is now holding Hillary Clinton’s feet to the fire, but she’s already the Democratic nominee. All this truth-telling may be too little, too late.

Source: Breitbart

DAMN! The US Military Takes A Stand Against Obama…HISTORIC & SHOCKING!
“Mutiny,” like “treason,” isn’t a word anyone should throw around lightly. When a distinguished soldier uses it, civilians should sit up and take notice.
Normally no soldier would celebrate a mutiny, either, but these aren’t ordinary times, and the soldier in question is no ordinary man in uniform, either.

Allen West is one such extraordinary man, and he’s penned a lengthy reaction to a new Washington Times report that:

Rifts have emerged between U.S. military leaders and the Obama White House on Washington’s future role in Libya, with the generals questioning the White House’s argument that the recent success against Islamic State shows Libya can go it alone in the fight against terrorism, without direct U.S. assistance.

West starts off:

[Y]ou know something is happening when uniformed members of the military, finally, stand up and openly criticize the state of our force readiness and the lack of strategy. Yes, I know what y’all are saying, what took so long?

The deteriorating situation in Libya is a direct result of Obama’s ill-conceived intervention there. (…)

Now, if this was all happening during a Republican administration, the liberal progressive media would be screaming from the rafters — heck, they still attack Reagan over Iran-Contra. But this is “their guy” and he can do no wrong. Things are slowly unraveling right before Obama’s eyes, but the leftist media will not expose him — or Hillary Clinton — on the issue.

West ends with a dire warning:

The next presidential administration will have the challenge of rebuilding our military while it is in contact with the enemy who has been aided and abetted by the president of the United States, Barack Obama — it happened on his watch, and Libya is a direct result of a failed Obama policy. Then again, if it’s a Hillary Clinton administration, we’ll be getting more of the same.

West also points out that the United States has been at war with Islamists since the days of the Barbary pirates. Obama hasn’t made America any safer from this scourge. Clearly only a Republican successor to the Oval Office will even attempt to do so.

Credit: AllenBWest.com