Discover posts

Explore captivating content and diverse perspectives on our Discover page. Uncover fresh ideas and engage in meaningful conversations

NNAMDI KANU: LAST ADVICE TO BUHARI'S SISTER, JUSTICE BINTA AS SHE TAKES OVER FROM JOHN TSOHO


By Divine Rich
For Family Writers.

Some Jihadists were discharged and acquitted by the Kano State attorney General last week, even when evidence abounds that they were responsible for the beheading of Mrs. Bridget Agbahime, a Biafran Christian woman who lives in the northern part of Nigeria.

However, I don't know why Nnamdi Kanu's case is exceptional. Nnamdi Kanu is Innocent and you are aware of that, don't attract curse upon yourself and family by trying to meddle with justice in other to please your employers and brother, General Buhari. We are not going to allow it this time. If you eventually attempt to do that by maneuvering justice or ruling against our leader, Nnamdi Kanu, we shall surely reject it.

Be wise because our leader Nnamdi Kanu is innocent and must surely be free whether Buhari like it or not. Biafra is a divine project and Nnamdi Kanu is the harbinger of that project therefore Nnamdi Kanu is ordained.

Remember the New Testament biblical analogy of how Yeshua openly warned his followers concerning the persecutions that will befall them, by warning them earlier never to give up. He said, "you will be rejected and prosecuted for my names sake but do not worry or give up, because those that endures to the end will wear the crown of glory," He (Yeshua) concluded.

To buttress this fact , the world have witnessed how Buhari and his APC have been melting brutality on anyone that support our Leader Nnamdi Kanu, such as all IPOB members, supporters and even judges who ruled in favour of Nnamdi Kanu's release.

It is now a clear cut message to the world that Nnamdi Kanu has a divine mandate. He is from above, sent by the supreme Creator (Chukwuokike). There is also no doubt about the fact that we all have our own divine mandate, including you Justice Binta F.A. Your mandate starts from upholding justice for Nnamdi Kanu without any shred of fear or compromise.

Free Nnamdi Kanu, the light and you will be blessed, but ally with Buhari's tyranny and you shall regret the evil alliance.


Edited by Peter Nonso Ikeh
For Family Writers

IPOB: 8TH OF NOVEMBER A TURNING POINT TO ANOTHER DIMENSION OF BIAFRA STRUGGLE


By Orji Lois Ezinne
For family Writers

There is this saying that goes "action speaks louder than words" would be appropriately reflected in the character of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, who has been a prisoner of conscience since 14th October 2015.

One may quiz about what manner of man is he, who upon all odds, have withstand the inhuman degradation, from the contraption called Nigeria and Nigerians, the answer to that assumption is very simple "one with CHUKWUOKIKEABIAMA has everything at his disposal".

I reflected on some of the telephone conversation of people who opined that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu may faulter, once he's been offered some buck and other goodies of life by the Nigerian government, but permit me to say that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is a year old now in prison and still remains more resolute. We can’t only see his resoluteness in words, it's also buttressed in his actions. The leader of the Indigenous people of Biafra, who has proven himself beyond comparison, for his unquenching love for Biafra and Biafrans, we are witnesses of his discrepancies, in the Nigerian judicial processes and matters in respect to Biafra restoration.

What do you think of the two court proceedings? One with ECOWAS, another with the federal high Court of Abuja, all on the same day, whatever is the case, we the Indigenous people of Biafra would always triumph. Justice Binta who intentionally fixed the same date ECOWAS hearing was going to be taking place, must know that, everything would always turn out for good for Biafrans.

November 8th 2016, Biafrans all over the world are urged to convene at ECOWAS and Federal high court Abuja. Let's show the world how formidable and steadfast we are.

What's going on? #Hashtag.. @Mention.. Link..
The expectation of the world is very high at the moment as the date for the delivery of verdict of ECOWAS court on the case between Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPO and the federal government of Nigeria is just less than 24 hours. It could be recalled that the ECOWAS court formerly billed to give its ruling on 4th October but due to absence of lawyers representing government of Nigeria, adjourned the ruling on the case to November 8 which is barely 24 hours. Now the whole world may have shifted their attention from Nigeria municipal federal high court where all sorts of judicial rascality had been perpetrated by Nigeria judicial officers under the influence of Nigeria maximum ruler, Gen Muhammadu Buhari to ECOWAS court where both local and international observers and followers of the case believed that unbendable justice will only be obtained. ECOWAS court has given enough respect to government of Nigeria which has flagrantly fail to reciprocate the respect towards the sub-regional court as Nigeria government in many occasions refused to be present or be represented in the court even questioned the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case in the first place

UNLAWFUL DETENTION: NNAMDI KANU'S ONE YEAR IN PRISON -- KANU MUST BE RELEASED AS HE APPEAR IN COURT ON 8TH NOV 2016



By Ndubuisi Ezeonyebuchi

For Family Writers

RESOLUTION ON SECRET CRUCIAL MEETING BETWEEN DAVID CAMERON AND MOHAMMADU BUHARI: "MAZI NNAMDI KANU MUST BE HELD IN PERPETUITY IRRESPECTIVE OF WHAT THE COURT AND HUMAN RIGHT ORGANIZATION SAYS. AS THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO EXTINGUISHED BIAFRA".

It is now clear to the world that the leader of indigenous people of Biafra IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is a prisoner of conscience, POC. It's now clear that he committed no crime against anybody, group or Nation. It's now clear that Mazi Kanu was arrested, tortured and incarcerated because of his commitment and determination towards the restoration of sovereign state of Biafra.

Right to self determination and freedom of speech is an international law as enshrine in UN charter, world democratic constitutions, including Nigeria. It is on this global constitutional right that the leader of Indigenous People Of Biafra (IPO, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu premised his divine quest for Biafra restoration. He started by setting up an indigenous radio station called 'Radio Biafra' in accordance with article 16 of 2007 UN Charter; "Indigenous peoples have the right to establish their own media in their own languages and to have access to all forms of non-indigenous media without discrimination". Radio Biafra which can be received anywhere on planet earth was aimed at sensitizing indigenous people of Biafra (IPO who are scattered across the world about the new nation.

As the wave of his(Kanu) freedom massage in disseminate through Radio Biafra, attracting millions of followers across the globe, Muhammadu Buhari led Nigeria government was panicked, to stop him(Kanu), he(Buhari) must break the law, condescend to kidnapping, flout court orders, bribe judges and arrest those(judges) refuse to take bribe. Muhammadu Buhari through his murderous DSS kidnapped the leader of IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu on 14th Oct 2015 in his hotel room in Lagos. After then, it was reached between him (Buhari) and David Cameron in a secret crucial meeting that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu must be held in perpetuity irrespective of what the court and human right organization says. As this is the only way to extinguished Biafra. While the leader of IPOB were still on trial on three bogus count charges, Muhammadu Buhari arrogantly informed the whole world on his national media chat on 31st December 2015 that he is both the Executive and Judiciary and hence, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu shall not be granted bail.

Before his (Buhari) infamous media chat, some honorable judges such as Shaubu Usman and Justice Adeniyi Ademola have in separate court sitting granted Mazi Nnamdi Kanu conditional and unconditional bail respectively. But Muhammadu Buhari flouted it saying that Mazi Kanu shall not be released, perhaps because his master David Cameron have instructed so. Buhari continue his barbaric attitude by arraigning Mazi Nnamdi Kanu on federal high court yet again before another judge (i.e after being discharged and acquitted by justice Ademola of federal high court). This time, it is a highly compromised judge, justice John Tosho, the judge who received the sum of 100 million naira from President Buhari for the sole purpose of convicting and sentencing Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. Tosho's evil plan was laid bare when he contradicted his own ruling which subsequently led to his shameful withdrawal from the case.

IPOB leader's case: Before the new judge in charge of the case, justice Binta Nyako was made public, Buhari-DSS have brutally raided the houses of some courageous and unbiased judges at midnight, sparing justice Binta Nyako on the condition that she will continue where justice John Tosho stop. Justice Nyako assured the presidency of her undivided loyalty and promise to truncate the IPOB 8th Nov ECOWAS court date by fixing her own date same day.

IPOB leader is now one year in unlawful detention, as he appears before ECOWAS court on 8th November 2016, IPOB worldwide will expect nothing less than his unconditional release in accordance with the precept law or else IPOB will be forced to unveil their military wing.

Justice delayed=Justice denied. for the 4th time Buhari changes his charges against #NNAMDIKANU #FreeNnamdiKanu #FreeBiafra
at 16:580 Biafra, Featured,



Justice delayed=Justice denied. for the 4th time Buhari changes his charges against #NNAMDIKANU #FreeNnamdiKanu #FreeBiafra

NNAMDI KANU'S TRIAL SET TO BE DELAYED YET AGAIN AS BUHARI PERSONALLY GIVES THE ORDER FOR FRESH CHARGES TO BE FILED AGAINST THE IPOB LEADER

DSS BOASTS "WE WILL KEEP NNAMDI KANU IN DETENTION WITHOUT TRIAL UNTIL BUHARI LEAVES OFFICE"

Without shame, regard for the sanctity of court process, rule of law, natural justice and fair play, Major-General Muhammadu Buhari has for the fourth time filed fresh charges against Nnamdi Kanu, in a bid to truncate the ongoin trial and keep him, along with other Biafrans, in detention in perpetuity. Even a DSS lawyer boasted, while serving the new charges, that that they (DSS) will "keep amending the charges against Kanu to keep him in custody until he gives up and abandons Biafra agitation or through the term of President Buhari".

We IPOB feel the need therefore to draw the attention of the world to the deliberate and calculated attempt by Buhari and his DSS henchmen to keep delaying this trial.

This case was assigned to a new judge, Justice Binta Nyako over a month ago and all processes were filed in court by the defence team and served on the DSS as directed by the judge. However, instead of DSS through the Attorney General to file a counter claim to the bail application before the judge listed for hearing today 8 November 2016, they chose to file fresh charges, so the case will NOT commence today as scheduled. They the DSS and Attorney General had clear 3 weeks to file their amended charge or respond to the affidavit before the court, so the defence lawyers can respond accordingly before the hearing today, but they waited until close of court business yesterday evening 7 November 2016 before serving these new charges, so Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's defence team will have no time to respond to it before the main hearing today.

It should be noted that each time Buhari fails to intimidate a judge or is about to lose this case, he amends or brings a new charge to keep delaying the hearing as a way of keeping Nnamdi Kanu in jail illegally.

IPOB having publically ridiculed all previous charges levelled against our leader in a series of public lectures designed to enlighten the world on the emptiness and impossibility of these charges, the DSS have chosen to choose the option of amendment of charge as a way of truncating the trial because they know they cannot win it. This is fourth time that DSS has brought new charges in this one case.

The world must urgently consider punitive sanctions against Nigeria by suspending all judicial and legal cooperation with the country until this travesty of justice under Buhari is brought to an end. How can DSS and Attorney General be allowed to keep changing and altering charges at the very last minute as a way to continue the illegal detention of innocent people?


Nigeria must know that mankind is watching this case with keen interest from all over the world and today this latest episode of shame by the DSS will be laid bare before the whole world.

NNAMDI KANU: LAST ADVICE TO BUHARI'S SISTER, JUSTICE BINTA AS SHE TAKES OVER FROM JOHN TSOHO

NNAMDI KANU: LAST ADVICE TO BUHARI'S SISTER, JUSTICE BINTA AS SHE TAKES OVER FROM JOHN TSOHO


By Divine Rich
For Family Writers.

Some Jihadists were discharged and acquitted by the Kano State attorney General last week, even when evidence abounds that they were responsible for the beheading of Mrs. Bridget Agbahime, a Biafran Christian woman who lives in the northern part of Nigeria.

However, I don't know why Nnamdi Kanu's case is exceptional. Nnamdi Kanu is Innocent and you are aware of that, don't attract curse upon yourself and family by trying to meddle with justice in other to please your employers and brother, General Buhari. We are not going to allow it this time. If you eventually attempt to do that by maneuvering justice or ruling against our leader, Nnamdi Kanu, we shall surely reject it.

Be wise because our leader Nnamdi Kanu is innocent and must surely be free whether Buhari like it or not. Biafra is a divine project and Nnamdi Kanu is the harbinger of that project therefore Nnamdi Kanu is ordained.

Remember the New Testament biblical analogy of how Yeshua openly warned his followers concerning the persecutions that will befall them, by warning them earlier never to give up. He said, "you will be rejected and prosecuted for my names sake but do not worry or give up, because those that endures to the end will wear the crown of glory," He (Yeshua) concluded.

To buttress this fact , the world have witnessed how Buhari and his APC have been melting brutality on anyone that support our Leader Nnamdi Kanu, such as all IPOB members, supporters and even judges who ruled in favour of Nnamdi Kanu's release.

It is now a clear cut message to the world that Nnamdi Kanu has a divine mandate. He is from above, sent by the supreme Creator (Chukwuokike). There is also no doubt about the fact that we all have our own divine mandate, including you Justice Binta F.A. Your mandate starts from upholding justice for Nnamdi Kanu without any shred of fear or compromise.

Free Nnamdi Kanu, the light and you will be blessed, but ally with Buhari's tyranny and you shall regret the evil alliance.


Edited by Peter Nonso Ikeh
For Family Writers

IPOB Press Release !!! X-RAYING THE NEW CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST NNAMDI KANU BY MUHAMMADU BUHARI: A DANCE OF SHAME
at 22:320 Biafra, Featured,


November 8, 2016

Press Release

X-RAYING THE NEW CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST NNAMDI KANU BY MUHAMMADU BUHARI: A DANCE OF SHAME

PRELUDE: The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPO having reviewed all the Laws of the Federation of Nigeria and the Constitution of Nigeria hereby categorically make the following irrefutable assertions:

1) There is no place in any of the existing laws of Nigeria and the Constitution where the name or title or phrase ”Department of State Services (DSS)” can be found. Therefore, DSS is both illegal and unconstitutional.

2) There is no place in any of the existing laws of Nigeria and the Constitution where the terminology or phrase ”South-East zone” and ”South-South zone” can be found. Therefore, the terminology or phrase ”South-East zone” and ”South-South zone” are both illegal and unconstitutional.

3) Count One and Count Two of the new charges are invalid and must be thrown out because there is no such Law as “Criminal Code Act CAP. C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2014” and there is no Law known as “Criminal Code Act CAP. C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2000”


X-RAYING THE NEW CHARGES:
The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPO carried out a forensic analysis of the trumped-up charges brought against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and exposed the nullity and futility of the exercise which has many gaping holes. After studying our well-researched deconstruction of the frivolous charges, Muhammadu Buhari has now brought new charges and subsequently increased the charges against Nnamdi Kanu from three (3) to six (6). In our tradition, we are here to deconstruct and destroy these weak and error-laden charges.

CHARGE #1
“Conspiracy to commit a treasonable felony, contrary to section 516 of the Criminal Code Act Cap. C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2014 and punishable under the same section of the Act.”

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
That you Nnamdi Kanu, ‘M’, Onwudiwe Chidiebere ‘M’ Banjamin Madubugwu, ‘M’, David Nwawuisi, ‘M’ and others now at large on diverse dates in 2014 and 2015 in Nigeria and London, United Kingdom, did conspire amongst yourselves to broadcast on Radio Biafra monitored in Enugu and other areas within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, preparations being made by you and others at large, for states in the South-East and South-South zones and other communities in Kogi and Benue States to secede from the Federal Republic of Nigeria with a view to constituting same into a Republic of Biafra and you thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 516 of the Criminal Code Act, CAP. C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2000”

IPOB Comments on Charge #1:
Buhari has found out that it is unheard of in law that only one person will be charged for treasonable felony, hence he has now incorporated three more people to get out of the tight corner to which he found himself. We want to remind that entire humanity that each time the illegal and unconstitutional DSS wants to lose the case against Nnamdi Kanu they will introduce a new defendant. Recall that on the 18th of October Nnamdi Kanu was arraigned alone despite the fact that David Nwawuisi was already in jail and held without trial since July 2015.

When their frivolous charges of criminal intimidation collapsed at the Magistrates Court, they quickly charged Mazi Nnamdi Kanu with terrorism before the sagacious Justice A. F. A. Ademola and that too was dismissed. Now that they are faced with the option of releasing Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, they have introduced Benjamin Madubugwu and David Nwawuisi as well as Chidiebere Onwudiwe and charged all with Conspiracy to commit Treasonable Felony. These new set of charges is the fourth alteration of charges that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has encountered.

Also in this charge, it is not clear on who was where regarding the accused persons and the locations mentioned. In addition, the use of the term “others now at large” renders the charge a mere conjecture or guesswork because Buhari is expected to know those being accused by name. Using the term “others now at large” is akin to operating a blank cheque and as we observed in our previous forensic analysis. These “others now at large” could be Barack Obama, David Cameron, Theresa May, Bill Clinton, Prof. Osibanjo, Atiku Abubakar, Justice Binta Nyako, Mamman Daura, and even Aisha Buhari.

We also note that there is no specificity in date of commission of the crime and this renders the charge baseless. We posit that this time around, Buhari has made the charges more dismissive by using the term “diverse dates in 2014 and 2015”. To make his case arguably, Buhari must specify the date or dates of the commission of the crime. In the prelude, we have already mentioned that the term “South-East” and South-South” are illegal and unconstitutional.
Finally, we want to inform Buhari that the law he cited in “Particulars of Offence” is in conflict with the law cited in the “Charge.”. This alone renders this charge invalid.

CHARGE #2
“Treasonable felony, contrary to Section 41 (c) of the Criminal Code Act Cap. C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2014 and punishable under the same section of the Act.“

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
“That you Nnamdi Kanu ‘M‘ being the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPO on diverse dates in 2014 and 2015 in London, United Kingdom, did broadcast on Radio Biafra monitored in Enugu and other areas within the jusrisdcition of the is Honourable Court, preparations being made by you and others now at large, for states in the South-East and South-South zones and other communities in Kogi and Benue States to secede from the Federal Republic of Nigeria with a view to constituting same into a Republicof Biafra and you committed an offence punishable under Section 41(c) of the Criminal Code Act, CAP. C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004.

IPOB Comments on Charge #2:
Buhari has failed here to be specific on actual dates of commission of the crime of treasonable felony by using the term “diverse dates in 2014 and 2015“, which renders the accusation as lacking in specificity and typical of conjectures and beer-parlour guess-work. We want Buhari to tell the world if broadcasting in London makes the broadcast under the jurisdiction of the Abuja Court or is it being monitored in Enugu that makes a broadcast that was made in London now within the jurisdiction of Abuja Court.


Again we ask Buhari, who are these “others now at large“? How can you use the term “others now at large“ in a high-profile case such as treasonable felony without identifying the specific individuals involved thereby making it unbelievable and giving rooms for significant margins of error? Under the excuse of “others now at large“, many people can be wrongly termed as those who allegedly worked with Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. It is possible that Yusuf Buhari, Aminah Buhari, Zarah Buhari, and Ibrahim Babangida are among these “others now at large“.

Just as noted in the prelude, the illegality and unconstitutionality of South-East and South-South has already been established. Buhari is economical in words and should tell the world what “preparations” that are being made by Nnamdi Kanu and these “others now at large“ because the charge is not explanatory enough.

We want to remind Buhari that exercising the rights to self-determination is not equivalent to levying war against Nigeria. Broadcasting from London is not equivalent to levying war against Nigeria. It must be recalled that Buhari sponsored Radio Chanji in Northern part of Nigeria during the last Presidential Election in which he promised that he would make blood of Nigerians to flow on the streets if he loses the election.

CHARGE #3
“Managing an unlawful society, punishable under Section 63 of the Criminal Code Act, CAP. C38, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.“

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
“That you Nnamdi Kanu, ‘M‘, Onwudiwe Chidiebere ‘M‘ and others at large, on or about the year 2012 at London, United Kingdom and South East as well as South South parts of Nigeria within the Jurisdiction of this Honourable Court managed an unlawful society, to wit: the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPO, pursuant to your secessionist agenda, with intent to bringing into being, a Republic of Biafra out of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 63 of the Criminal Code Act, Cap. C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.“

IPOB Comments on Charge #3:
Is Buhari aware that IPOB is duly registered in the United Kingdom? If IPOB is truly registered in the United Kingdom, then what makes it an unlawful society? So Buhari is telling the world that Biafrans under the aegis of IPOB exerting their rights to self-determination as enshrined in the various declarations of the United Nations and the African Union is constituting an unlawful society? We can also extrapolate that Buhari has committed the same crime because on the 29th of September 205, Buhari made the following statement at the United General Assembly in New York: “The international community has come to pin its hopes on resolving the Palestinian issue through the two – states solution which recognises the legitimate right of each state to exist in peace and security. The world has no more excuses or reasons to delay the implementation of the long list of Security Council resolutions on this question. Neither do we have the moral right to deny any people their freedom or condemn them indefinitely to occupation and blockade.“

Section-62(2) of CAP C38 L.F. N. 2004 specified conditions under which an organization can be deemed unlawful society, and none of the conditions is against the rights of Indigenous People to self-determination.

We want to remind Buhari that Biafrans and IPOB exist in every nook and cranny of Nigeria and outside Nigeria. Therefore, it is an insult for Buhari to state that IPOB is managed only in London and in the illegal and unconstitutional South East and South South of Nigeria. We reiterate to Buhari that the right to self-determination is inalienable and irreducible and NOT a secessionist agenda. Buhari should know that inclusion of the term “others now at large“ makes this charge unsustainable and nothing but a mere guess-work because all accused persons must be known and identified and not just referred to as “others now at large“.

CHARGE #4
“Publication of defamatory matter, punishable under Section 375 of the Criminal Cod Act, Cap. C38, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004”

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
“That you, Nnamdi Kanu, on or about the 28th April, 2015 in London, United Kingdom did broadcast on Radio Biafra monitored in Enugu, Enugu State and other parts of Nigeria within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, referred to Major General Muhammadu Buhari, GCON President and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as a paedophile, a terrorist, and **** and an embodiment of evil knowing same to be false and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 375 of the Criminal Code Act, Cap C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.”

IPOB Comments on Charge #4:
This charge should be dismissed immediately for the following reasons:
1) As at 28th of April, 2015, Retired Major General Muhammadu Buhari was not the President and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Hence the title and the position ascribed to him was wrong and nullify the charge. If Buhar feels defamed by the alleged defamatory publications, he should sue Nnamdi Kanu in his private capacity because he was a private citizen as at April 28th, 2015.

2) On March 23rd 2015, an online newspaper called “thebreakingtimes” published an article in which it quoted Mrs Sarah Obozuwa, Founder of the Edo Women for Change (EWC), as saying that Aisha Buhari is a victim of childhood rape. Mrs Obozuwa asserted that Buhari (at 47 years of age) had sex with Aisha when she was just nine years old. This statement was made more than one month before the alleged comments of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and there has never been any denial or rebuttal from Buhari and Aisha.

3) On March 15, 2015, Sheikh Sani Haliru, a founding member of the dreaded jama’aful Ahlul sunna wal Liddawati wal Jihad also referred to as the Boko Haram, publicly confessed that Muhammadu Buhari is the founding father of Boko Haram and this was reported in “Naijaonppint.com” online newspaper. Again, Buhari did not refute this accusation.

4) Buhari has been involved in several incidences of inciting violence duraing and after elections. Currently, there is a case of against Buhari in The Hague for killing innocent Nigerians after he lost the 2011 elections. Therefore, it is not out of place to conclude that by his acts of commission and omission he is evil and his governance/leadership style since December 31, 1983 can be correctly defined as ****ic.

CHARGE #5
“Improper importation of goods contrary to Section 47(1 (a) (i) of the Customs and Excise Management Act, Cap. C45 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and punishable under the same section of the Act.”

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
That you, Nnamdi Kanu, between the month of March and April, 2015, imported into Nigeira a Radio Transmitter known as TRAM 50L and kept it in your house at Ubulusiuzor in Ihiala Local Government Area (LGA) of Anambra State, Nigeria within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court and you thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(1) (a) (i) of the Customs and Excise Management Act, Cap. C45 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

IPOB Comments on Charge #5:
First of all, Nnamdi Kanu does not have a house in Ubulusiuzor in Ihiala LGA, hence this nullifies the charge outright. Secondly, what is the proof that the duty on the said item was not paid for before it was removed from the wharf? Also, was this item forcefully or stealthily removed from the wharf considering the checks and balances and security networks supposedly existing in the wharf? On what day was this item removed without paying the requisite duty and who were the officers on duty on that day, especially those in charge of security and at the exit gates? When exactly did this crime take place because the commission of a crime must take place on a specific date and not the range of months being bandied about on the charge sheet?


CHARGE #6
“Improper importation of goods contrary to Section 47(2) (a) of the Customs and Excise Management Act, Cap. C45 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and punishable under the same section of the Act.”

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
“That you, Nnamdi Kanu, between the months of March and April, 2015 imported into Nigeria and kept in Ubulusiuzor in Ihiala Local Government Area of Anambra State within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, a Radio Transmitter known as TRAM 50L concealed in a container of used household items which you declared as used household items, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 47 (2) (a) of the Customs and Excise Management Act, Cap. C45 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and punishable under the same section of the Act.”

IPOB Comments on Charge #6:
The first question here is; when was this discovery made? Who was the Customs Officer on duty who cleared this container? Was thorough inspection not part of the process required to clear goods from Nigerian Ports and who inspected this container? What is the proof that the said item was not properly cleared under a competent Customs Official? Was this offence part of the reason why Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was abducted by the illegal and unconstitutional DSS on October 14, 2015?


Signed
Barrister Emma Nmezu
Dr. Clifford Chukwuemeka Iroanya

Spokesperson for IPOB

Black Lives Matter Leader: ‘We Will INCITE RIOTS Everywhere If Trump Wins’
•By phoenix •In Crime, Election, General News, Politics


BLM and OBLM

Though the outcome of America’s presidential election is still up in the air, Black Lives Matter has made it clear that one outcome is certain. If Donald Trump is the victor, violence will erupt in the streets. This according to rapper and activist Tef Poe when he took to Twitter to say,

“Dear white people if Trump wins young n****s such as myself are fully hell bent on inciting riots everywhere we go. Just so you know.”

If you are unsure who ‘Tef Poe’ is, don’t worry, you are not alone. All you really need to know about him is that he is the co-founder of the Hands Up United organization out of Ferguson, Missouri. His organization chose its name based off of the false narrative that Michael Brown, a teenage thug, had his hands up and back turned to officer Darren Wilson when he was shot.

Forensic and eyewitness evidence have since proven that story to be wrong, but the Black Lives Matter movement continues to spread it as if it were true. Tef Poe told News One that,

The Hands Up Don’t Shoot movement, “Represents that Mike Brown was unarmed. Hands up or not, he didn’t have a weapon.”

Forensic evidence and a grand jury found that, weapon or not, Michael Brown was assaulting a police officer, and trying to take Officer Darren Wilson’s gun.

Tef Poe is now serving as a top leader in the group Black Lives Matter, that is often mocked for its black-supremacist ideas by being refereed to as Only Black Lives Matter. He also used social media to say,

“Trump wins aint no more rules fammo. We’ve been too nice as is.”

Since the comments from Poe have caught the public’s attention, the Black Lives Matter leader has since deleted the posts with accusations that he is being slandered. Info Wars was able to obtain a screenshot of the posts that were snagged before they were deleted.

Longtime Clinton Aid: If America Read All of Hillary’s Emails She Could ‘Lose 49 States’

Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during a campaign rally on November 7, 2016 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. With one day to go until election day, Hillary Clinton is campaigning in Pennsylvania, Michigan and North Carolina.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

by Aaron Klein7 Nov 20165,780

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

NEW YORK — If Americans were to read all of Hillary Clinton’s emails “she would either win 49 states, or lose 49 states,” wrote Philippe I. Reines, Clinton’s longtime aide who served as her senior advisor while she was Secretary of State.

In the same email, Reines cryptically wrote about Clinton’s email scandal that “email retention = Benghazi.”

The March 3, 2015 correspondence was posted by Wikileaks after the email was ostensibly captured in John Podesta’s hacked gmail account.

The message was a response to a suggestion from Clinton’s communications director, Jennifer Palmieri, that Clinton make a joke about the email fiasco during a charity dinner later that day. This was two months before the State Department publicly released the first batch of Clinton’s emails, messages which had previously been provided to the House Select Committee on Benghazi .

“Greetings. I wanted to float idea of HRC making a joke about the email situation at the Emily’s List dinner tonight. What do folks think about that?” Palmieri asked, in an email to numerous Clinton confidantes, including Podesta and Reines.

“Margolis and I discussed,” replied Mandy Grunwald, a communications adviser to Clinton. “We don’t know what’s in the emails, so we are nervous about this. Might get a big laugh tonight and regret it when content of emails is disclosed.”

That’s when Reines chimed in with his remarks:

Trust me, most of the email themselves are funnier than any joke we can come up with. Read in total by America she would either win 49 states, or lose 49 states. I go back and forth.

I’m not hard over either way, but I would not make a joke just for the sake of making a joke, because email retention = Benghazi.

BUT, if we could get some business done in a light way it’s worth trying: signaling that she is more than fine with them making their way into the public domain. Because past the process stuff, next phase is content. And the assumption is that she did this secretly, hiding, etc. Simply not true. We can’t jam State to release them at this point, but if Dan can think of a light way to say “I am proud of the work we did at State and hopefully at some point everyone will be able to read what’s in them as a way to better understand that work, but until then, I want to talk about…” Doesn’t need to be at the top, could be at some natural point.

That’s my strong vote since I think her expressing more than a willingness for them to be released into the wild is what’s most important.

Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow. Follow him on Facebook.

With research by Joshua Klein.

Chimaraoke Obi

Trump's victory heralds liberation of the people from the extant evil establishment.He has made it clear that he seeks to end the influence of the corrupt statu quo that has so far gagged mainstream media and left the world in opaque.If the truth most be told,then we ought to boldly embrace the fact that these contemporary politicians who tenaciously seek to hold onto the power forever,are the same political leaders who by their whims and caprices brought the World to a near deadend today.And how would a people in their right senses and frame of mind want this hellish statu quo to continue ? It beats imagination and rational thought contemplating over the likelihood of bandwagon effect,despite the urgent need for a veer.