Hello

How can i change my profile picture,

Biafra my Religion

Hello people

Wow I love this.. All hail Biafra

TRIAL JUDGE; JUSTICE BINTA NYAKO MAY JOIN THE PROTEST FOR NNAMDI KANU’S RELEASE



By Ifeanyi Chijioke

02 November, 2016

I recently saw a group of Nigerian lawyers’ barricade roads and chanting what they described as ‘Invasion of the Judiciary’. Their anger is very simple; disrespect of court order that doesn’t favour the executive which passes a message that they don’t want anything justice hence it is against Buhari. There was an accusation that the executive wants to pocket the Judiciary and total control of that arm. They said that section 158 of the 1999 constitution is under threat and that it would only invite anarchy. They further questioned why the Judges whose houses were invaded are the ones that gave the executive un-favourable judgment without bias. They mentioned Nnamdi Kanu and questioned why a man that committed no crime known to the constitution of Nigeria and the world could still be in detention despite court orders that ordered his unconditional release.



On the issue of Dasuki who was accused of misappropriation of fund; there was a case which Buhari said; give me the money you took and go. On the issue of Nnamdi Kanu; what will Buhari make as a case? That Nnamdi Kanu forfeits his freedom of speech or right to agitate? There is nothing to hold against Nnamdi Kanu because he did not grow up in Nigeria that he would say he stole Nigerian money. He has nothing to do with Nigerian State and have no business whatsoever; neither is he ready to give up his right because of Buhari’s opposing view. Nnamdi Kanu only made sure he respects and abide by the law; anything less or more than that has nothing to do with him. The accusation against Nnamdi Kanu is that he asked for Biafra; the question is; did Nigerian constitution criminalize fair and peaceful demand or plea through agitation in a democracy? Sitting down to hear cock-and-bull story of how one man committed treasonable felony is the joke of the century.



With 2007 UN charter on the Rights of Indigenous People starring at Justice Binta Nyako; I wonder why she wouldn’t join the protest and call for the release of Nnamdi Kanu. Had Nnamdi Kanu started this agitation before the Charter; it would have been a complex case or a bit arguable. The issue could have been that democracy did not give right to agitate for what is not lawfully obtainable. But when self determination is lawfully obtainable by virtue of the UN 2007 convention domesticated by Nigeria; I wonder why Justice Binta Nyako would not join the protesting lawyers to demand Nnamdi Kanu’s release. If interpretation of UN 2007 charter proves too much or Binta gives in to the trumped up charges that self determination amounts to treasonable felony; then let her prove it to the world. We are waiting because we know everything is possible in Nigeria; let’s see the miracle happen.



The executive negligibly disrespected the Judiciary and one of the annoying facts therein is; the executive is blatantly or obviously influencing the Judiciary. Buhari is unaware of the consequences of his actions; hence he openly went on to influence the Judiciary instead of diplomatically or secretly do it to at least respect that arm of government. During his median media chat; had he closed his mouth and mildly or diplomatically made prejudicial statements; it would have been fair. Had he said “The Court will decide” and then secretly go at the back and influence the Court; it would have been a bit respectable. But blatantly coming before the world to say he would not release Nnamdi Kanu or allow any Court do that is a big-big disgrace to the Nigerian Judiciary. Men have to stand and be counted; Justice Binta Nyako can join the protesting lawyers to shape the future of the bench and the bar.



Till date, the Judiciary has implemented the words of the President like there is nobody therein or one that has the words of his or her own and like the Judiciary lacks the independence to do justice. The Nigerian Judiciary has functioned more like a Minister who listens and talks for the President and not like an arm of the government that check and balance the system. For more than a year; the Nigerian Judiciary cannot adjudicate on or interpret an existing law. For more than a year; corruption has hindered the matter before the Nigerian Judiciary. As the ant of Africa - not, giant of Africa; it is disgraceful that rule of law has been murdered without men putting up a fight. The fight today is a bit too late; Justice Binta Nyako can join the protest but she has to start by doing justice from 8th of November.



There is Nnamdi Kanu in Boris Jonson of UK Nigeria copied her constitution and nobody arrested him even Cameron resigned when he could not win the argument. There is Nnamdi Kanu in Catalonia aspiring for self determination and nobody accused him of treasonable felony but rather engaged him in a debate. There is Nnamdi Kanu in Scotland and nobody tortured her; that Nnamdi Kanu was even given referendum and he lost and yet seeking another one and was not arrested and charged with treasonable felony. There is Nnamdi Kanu is Venezuela and nobody arrested him but a debate was called to iron out a solution. Now there is Nnamdi Kanu in Nigeria and there is arrest, detention against court order; murder and prohibited torture.



Is Nigeria not part of the world meant for humanity; is there no law in Nigeria and if lawyers indeed exist in Nigeria; where are the laws? Is here a geographical space meant for Homo erectus who mutate into Homo sapiens only when they migrate to the human world? There is history waiting for Justice Binta Nyako to make and there are questions waiting for her to answer. Nobody knows where she would come from or how she would make the history or answer the questions. Her readiness to make or mal starts from 8th of November; cross your legs and fold your arms while I bring you arguments and criticism. I have earlier on said; Nnamdi Kanu’s case is a poison and also a glory; you either make or mal your personality and Country.



Editor/Publisher: Chinwe Korie

BIAFRA: [IPOB PRESS RELEASE]: IPOB WELCOMES MUHAMMADU BUHARI’S DECLARATION ON THE IMPENDING DISINTEGRATION OF NIGERIA BUT SAYS NO TO CONDITIONS



November 2, 2016

We at IPOB are delighted with the comments attributed to the maximum ruler of Nigeria, Retired Major-General Muhamadu Buhari, who seem to have bowed to international pressure to consider the inevitable disintegration of Nigeria, though with conditions we find inconsistent with common sense and logic. According to Buhari, “any Nigerian is free to leave the country if they have another one.” Buhari also stated that “If anybody has a country to go to, let him go, we will stay here and salvage our country.” It is crystal clear that Buhari has seen the futility of fighting against a determined people who are bent on restoring their God given nation which was unjustly robbed them by slave merchants later turned colonialists.



From all indications, Buhari must have consulted with his colonial backers and religious handlers in Arabia who perhaps have taken the time to school him on the sanctity of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP), the inviolability and irreducibility of the rights of Indigenous People to self-determination.



However, we observed that hidden in the statements of Buhari are two evil agendas. First evil agenda is that Buhari made this statement in a meeting he had with Biafrans from the riverine or southern part of Biafra which the Hausa-Fulani oligarchy nicknamed South-South or Niger-Delta. The underlying objective in Buhari’s statement is to create the impression that the so-called South-South is not part of Biafraland, hence the upland areas of Biafra (Igbo) can leave Nigeria while the riverine areas (Ibibio, Efik, Izon, Itshekiri, Urhobo, Isoko) will remain part of Nigeria. The plan is to trap the riverine areas of Biafraland in Nigeria to enable Buhari and his Hausa-Fulani oligarchy continue the shameless exploitation and stealing of Biafra’s natural resources which they have always used and will continue to use to develop the Arewa region of Nigeria.



The only surprise is that Buhari and his handlers did not include the rich Orient oil fields of Anambra River Basin, the high-yield Shell-operated Egbema oil fields in Imo State, the abundant gas reserves at Ohaji also in Imo State and the Shell-operated Ukwa deep oil well in Abia State in their so-called South-South/Niger Delta.



Successive governments of Nigeria have continued to deceive the gullible public that the reason we (IPO are agitating for Biafra is because of oil in the Niger Delta region, without making obvious the fact that oil was first found in commercial quantity in Imo State before Oloibiri in Bayelsa State. Sadly many people are still ignorant of the fact that active oil and gas extraction is happening today in Anambra, Imo, Abia and Igbo parts of Rivers State. It is pertinent we make clear to all and sundry that while oil may motivate the Arewa North to seek One Nigeria because they cannot live without it due to their lazy parasitic nature, in Biafraland and in the new Biafra we shall place 100% emphasis on human capital development, not on natural occurring minerals.



For a country to pin the hopes of its entire economic policy and well-being on a finite natural resource is indicative of the level of intellectual backwardness of the self-arrogating "elites" that run the economy of the colonial contraption known as Nigeria. We, the Indigenous People of Biafra, believe that the greatest natural resource a people can be endowed with is their brain not what is under the ground.



We must stress for purposes of sound knowledge that there is no known geographical cardinal point in any geography text book or academic literature or any part of this world called “South-South” except in Nigeria. This unique un-academic introduction of a new cardinal point called “South-South” was created by the Hausa-Fulani oligarchy to serve their divide and rule interests. With this dichotomy, they intend to continue to own virtually all the oil blocks in Biafraland including those at Anambra, Imo, Abia and Igbo parts of Rivers State. But the same Hausa-Fulani natural-born rulers of Nigeria refused to create corresponding cardinal points of “North-north” and “West-west.” Sensible people must ask themselves why this is the case.



The Hausa-Fulani ruling class carefully created this unique cardinal point of “South-South” to drive an everlasting wedge between the upland and riverine areas of Biafraland. Furthermore, the “South-South” is not contained in any part of the Constitution of Nigeria nor is it any of the Acts of Parliament or Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (L.F.N.).



The second evil agenda of Buhari is that by making such statements before these respected leaders from the riverine area of Biafraland, he is creating the false impression that he has obtained the consent of the people of Southern Biafra to build the Nigeria of his dreams. Buhari in so doing is giving a misleading signal that Biafrans from the riverine areas have bought into his deceptive and foundationally disastrous “One Nigeria” project.



By gathering a few Biafrans from the riverine areas and saying that “those who don’t want to be part of Nigeria should leave,” Buhari hopes to convince the world that those Biafrans he was addressing at Aso Rock believe in the “oneness” of the British colony Nigeria he is assiduously pursuing.



We, the Indigenous People of Biafra, at this point would wish to categorically inform Buhari that since we already have our blessed nation Biafra created by the Most High God not man; we do not need the temporary country called Nigeria created by a white man Frederick Luggard for his amusement and economic exploitation.



We wish to further inform Buhari that Indigenous People of Biafra do not desire to regress from the status of a nation-state to that of a country artificially created by the British with divergent and irreconcilable value systems. Even today nations that make up Britain like Scotland and Wales are agitating, as we Biafrans are, to establish their own nation-state outside Britain, so why should Nigeria that is created by a white British man be immune to similar demands being made by Biafrans?



We were Biafrans before the British Government through the instrumentality of the Royal Niger Company forced us into this contraption christened Nigeria by Flora Shaw at the time the mistress of Frederick Luggard. Buhari professes his faith in Islam and belief that a woman's position in society is limited to the confines of the kitchen yet his anti-women rhetoric does not extend to the abolition of the name Nigeria because that name for which he has killed millions, was given by an unmarried white woman to the unfortunate people known today as Nigerians. Buhari, Gowon and other genocidists should be ashamed of themselves and their supposed proud African heritage for their role in the death of millions of Biafrans killed in order to preserve a colony created by a white man in black Africa and named by a white woman not a black African man or woman.



Fortunately, we have not lost our sense of indigenous identity or nationhood as some commentators would have us believe. Therefore, we are very happy to hear from Buhari that he has at last come to terms with the folly of trying to continue to deploy the brutality of the Nigerian military to force us, Indigenous People of Biafra, to be Nigerians against our wish. Hence we welcome with open arms the declaration of Major-General Muhammadu Buhari that we Biafrans are now free to leave the contraption called Nigeria and go home to rebuild our battered but blessed nation of Biafra. We hope that Buhari will now stop his wholesale massacre, arrest and illegal detention of peaceful and unarmed Indigenous People of Biafra and hurry to free the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, and other illegally detained prisoners of conscience.



We look forward to Buhari and his Hausa-Fulani owners of "One Nigeria" making arrangements for a bipartisan meeting of Arewa dominated Nigeria and Indigenous People of Biafra for the purpose of determining the modalities and date of a Biafrexit referendum to determine the will of the people once and for all time.



For once, Buhari has spoken reasonably well though his conditions of carving out of the riverine areas of Biafraland into his “One Nigeria” dream in the classic divide and rule mindset is not acceptable to us, the Indigenous People of Biafra. Buhari needs to come to terms with the fact that IPOB will not leave any part of Biafraland, from the plains of Idomaland to the shorelines of Opobo Kingdom, to become a conquered territory like the Yoruba-owned Ilorin which today is under Caliphate rule answerable to the Sultan of Sokoto and not the Ooni of Ife.



The restoration of the nation of Biafra is irrevocably sacrosanct and irreversible, no amount of gamesmanship on the part of Buhari and his colonial handlers can stop it.

Biafra or Death!!!



Signed

Barrister Emma Nmezu

Dr. Clifford Chukwuemeka Iroanya

Spokesperson for IPOB



Publisher: Chinwe Korie

BIAFRA: MARK ZUCKERBERG A JEWISH SMILLING ASSASSIN: BIAFRA RESTORATION IS AN IDEOLOGY THAT CAN NEVER BE DEFEATED

By Kelechi Okorie
02 November, 2016

A mortal body can be killed and destroyed but once an idea has taken hold, you cannot destroy it despite the force. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg ought to have known ideology is an instinct before embarking on his evil deal with the Nigerian President, Muhammadu Buhari to shutdown Radio Biafra London group on facebook. RBL the highest contributory forum on Facebook with active membership close to a million with a motive to liberate mankind from bondage of Buhari’s fascism, mental torture, annihilation and subjugation.

Mark a Jewish US citizen failed to understand the rationale behind Biafra struggle; persecution of Jews which Biafra is among, undergoing in different geographical locations affected the history and social develoption of the countries, societies where the persecutions occurred. Why a man whose family benefited from the freedom and opportunity in USA turns around brutally suppressing freedom of speech and expression? His unprecedented alliance with tyrant Buhari to restrict Biafrans from disseminating their gospel of redemption to the world cannot change anything as long as Biafrans live. If Biafrans can withstand Awolowo’s food blockage during 1967-1970 genocidal war, Zuckerberg's media blackout is null and void. If US was not liberated from the shackle of darkness, would he have had an opportunity today to excel in life? Mark has made himself a willing tool to an Islamic extremist and unrepentant stark illiterate terrorist.

Perhaps, his inability to learn a lesson can only destroy his hard work; recall the day Satlink had a secret deal with Nigeria government under the same Buhari to remove his nightmare, Radio Biafra from their satellite, that same week their satellite mysteriously disappeared from earth’s orbit till date its whereabouts remains unknown.

Man is naturally wicked, nasty and selfish. Mark’s recent trip to Aso Rock Abuja, Nigeria seat of fraud and headquarters of evil empire with their unholy silent plans to exterminate Biafrans can only backfire on him, he has easily forgotten his doom day after cutting a malicious clampdown on Biafrans, explosion destroyed his $200m Facebook Satellite space X Falcon 9 and its Amos 9 Satellite payload during a routine rocket firing in...follow link to read more: